"I wouldn’t tell my nine-year-old self anything! I’ve seen Back to the Future enough to know that you don’t mess with time. Nice try, bro."
— Chris Pratt, responding to “What if you could tell your nine-year-old self, “One day, you’ll be starring in a film based on these comics you love?” - Rolling Stone, Issue 1215. (via captainsassmerica)

devidsketchbook:

WATER AND BONSAI BY AZUMA MAKOTO 

Artist Azuma Makoto (facebook) - A beautifully curved deadwood of Sabina chinesis is attached to java moss resembling leaves. Different trunk and leaves are combined to form Bonsai, which now rests in a new environment with water. movie

[ gif made by DevidSketchbook ]

mansionofmuses:

valperch:

empresspinto:

I’m sorry but I was totally expecting that to be an innuendo

LOL OH SHIT ITS BACK

I like how the mustard doesn’t even fucking squirt out. Like wow what a worthless ass ghost.

(Source: 30secondstocalifornia)

sushigrade:

feigenbaumsworld:

gunslingerannie:

littlewiggy:

peripateticfangirl:

huffpostbooks:

What’s Your Book Shelfie Style?

personal significance mixed with chronological

Stacked for space, genre, alphabetical by author, special shelf for personal meaning. I don’t fuck around with my book organization.

Mine are sorted by theme; there’s a shelf for my collection of old books, a shelf for my massive collection of Holmesiana, a shelf for comics, a shelf for my Garth Nix (of which I have a great many), a (section of) a shelf for Tolkien etc. Within those sections things are just put wherever with the exception of the Holmesiana, which is chronological.
The manga collection, however, IS sorted alphabetically by title, as is the DVD collection.

People organize their books? er…um I mean I organize my books all the time. 

L has all our books organized throughout the house by genre and then generally by author. And feigenbaumsworld, she will likely be so horrified by the thought of unorganized books that she’ll be on her way down as soon as she reads this. sushigrade:

feigenbaumsworld:

gunslingerannie:

littlewiggy:

peripateticfangirl:

huffpostbooks:

What’s Your Book Shelfie Style?

personal significance mixed with chronological

Stacked for space, genre, alphabetical by author, special shelf for personal meaning. I don’t fuck around with my book organization.

Mine are sorted by theme; there’s a shelf for my collection of old books, a shelf for my massive collection of Holmesiana, a shelf for comics, a shelf for my Garth Nix (of which I have a great many), a (section of) a shelf for Tolkien etc. Within those sections things are just put wherever with the exception of the Holmesiana, which is chronological.
The manga collection, however, IS sorted alphabetically by title, as is the DVD collection.

People organize their books? er…um I mean I organize my books all the time. 

L has all our books organized throughout the house by genre and then generally by author. And feigenbaumsworld, she will likely be so horrified by the thought of unorganized books that she’ll be on her way down as soon as she reads this. sushigrade:

feigenbaumsworld:

gunslingerannie:

littlewiggy:

peripateticfangirl:

huffpostbooks:

What’s Your Book Shelfie Style?

personal significance mixed with chronological

Stacked for space, genre, alphabetical by author, special shelf for personal meaning. I don’t fuck around with my book organization.

Mine are sorted by theme; there’s a shelf for my collection of old books, a shelf for my massive collection of Holmesiana, a shelf for comics, a shelf for my Garth Nix (of which I have a great many), a (section of) a shelf for Tolkien etc. Within those sections things are just put wherever with the exception of the Holmesiana, which is chronological.
The manga collection, however, IS sorted alphabetically by title, as is the DVD collection.

People organize their books? er…um I mean I organize my books all the time. 

L has all our books organized throughout the house by genre and then generally by author. And feigenbaumsworld, she will likely be so horrified by the thought of unorganized books that she’ll be on her way down as soon as she reads this. sushigrade:

feigenbaumsworld:

gunslingerannie:

littlewiggy:

peripateticfangirl:

huffpostbooks:

What’s Your Book Shelfie Style?

personal significance mixed with chronological

Stacked for space, genre, alphabetical by author, special shelf for personal meaning. I don’t fuck around with my book organization.

Mine are sorted by theme; there’s a shelf for my collection of old books, a shelf for my massive collection of Holmesiana, a shelf for comics, a shelf for my Garth Nix (of which I have a great many), a (section of) a shelf for Tolkien etc. Within those sections things are just put wherever with the exception of the Holmesiana, which is chronological.
The manga collection, however, IS sorted alphabetically by title, as is the DVD collection.

People organize their books? er…um I mean I organize my books all the time. 

L has all our books organized throughout the house by genre and then generally by author. And feigenbaumsworld, she will likely be so horrified by the thought of unorganized books that she’ll be on her way down as soon as she reads this. sushigrade:

feigenbaumsworld:

gunslingerannie:

littlewiggy:

peripateticfangirl:

huffpostbooks:

What’s Your Book Shelfie Style?

personal significance mixed with chronological

Stacked for space, genre, alphabetical by author, special shelf for personal meaning. I don’t fuck around with my book organization.

Mine are sorted by theme; there’s a shelf for my collection of old books, a shelf for my massive collection of Holmesiana, a shelf for comics, a shelf for my Garth Nix (of which I have a great many), a (section of) a shelf for Tolkien etc. Within those sections things are just put wherever with the exception of the Holmesiana, which is chronological.
The manga collection, however, IS sorted alphabetically by title, as is the DVD collection.

People organize their books? er…um I mean I organize my books all the time. 

L has all our books organized throughout the house by genre and then generally by author. And feigenbaumsworld, she will likely be so horrified by the thought of unorganized books that she’ll be on her way down as soon as she reads this.

sushigrade:

feigenbaumsworld:

gunslingerannie:

littlewiggy:

peripateticfangirl:

huffpostbooks:

What’s Your Book Shelfie Style?

personal significance mixed with chronological

Stacked for space, genre, alphabetical by author, special shelf for personal meaning. I don’t fuck around with my book organization.

Mine are sorted by theme; there’s a shelf for my collection of old books, a shelf for my massive collection of Holmesiana, a shelf for comics, a shelf for my Garth Nix (of which I have a great many), a (section of) a shelf for Tolkien etc. Within those sections things are just put wherever with the exception of the Holmesiana, which is chronological.

The manga collection, however, IS sorted alphabetically by title, as is the DVD collection.

People organize their books? er…um I mean I organize my books all the time. 

L has all our books organized throughout the house by genre and then generally by author. And feigenbaumsworld, she will likely be so horrified by the thought of unorganized books that she’ll be on her way down as soon as she reads this.

averagefairy:

averagefairy:

did humans invent math or did we discover it

does math even exist

i already regret making this post bc smart people keep messaging me trying to explain math and it’s making me nauseous 

gwayordafreeway:

I’m always fascinated in seeing this type of creativity. It’s like how did they even begin to think of something this dope. Blows my mind.
gwayordafreeway:

I’m always fascinated in seeing this type of creativity. It’s like how did they even begin to think of something this dope. Blows my mind.
gwayordafreeway:

I’m always fascinated in seeing this type of creativity. It’s like how did they even begin to think of something this dope. Blows my mind.
gwayordafreeway:

I’m always fascinated in seeing this type of creativity. It’s like how did they even begin to think of something this dope. Blows my mind.
gwayordafreeway:

I’m always fascinated in seeing this type of creativity. It’s like how did they even begin to think of something this dope. Blows my mind.
gwayordafreeway:

I’m always fascinated in seeing this type of creativity. It’s like how did they even begin to think of something this dope. Blows my mind.
gwayordafreeway:

I’m always fascinated in seeing this type of creativity. It’s like how did they even begin to think of something this dope. Blows my mind.
gwayordafreeway:

I’m always fascinated in seeing this type of creativity. It’s like how did they even begin to think of something this dope. Blows my mind.
gwayordafreeway:

I’m always fascinated in seeing this type of creativity. It’s like how did they even begin to think of something this dope. Blows my mind.

gwayordafreeway:

I’m always fascinated in seeing this type of creativity. It’s like how did they even begin to think of something this dope. Blows my mind.

(Source: sammylumpkins)

blastedheath:

Chris Fennell (American, b. 1966), A Crash Without A Sound, 2013. Acrylic, glitter, cut painted paper, sequins and acryloid resin on canvas over panel, 60 × 48 in.

  1. Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mark II
  2. Aperture: f/16
  3. Exposure: 1/80th
  4. Focal Length: 50mm

crockercrocs:

sir-laughsalot:

laughoutloudrightnow:

pizzaforpresident:

have you ever seen a chicken strip

image

image

There are two kinds of people in this world.

(Source: rhyse)

walrus-in-the-tardis:

mariealbertine:

The time our entire design class dressed up for Halloween as the design teacher (who notoriously almost only wore grey sweaters and always had a cafeteria coffee in hand).

I remember him walking down a super long empty hall and we all just turned the corner at the other end and started running towards him and he ran away yelling “FUcK YOU GUYS” and in retrospect I almost can’t believe he didn’t suffer a heart attack.

Pretty sure we won a pizza party for best costume that year.

IVE SEEN THIS ABOUT TEN TIMES AND IM JUST NOW NOTICING THAT THE ACTUAL TEACHER IS IN THE PICTURE TOO 

foulplaythoughts:

I WASN’T EXPECTING THAT
foulplaythoughts:

I WASN’T EXPECTING THAT

foulplaythoughts:

I WASN’T EXPECTING THAT

(Source: triggafiasco)

epic-vines:

Narrating people’s lives at the gym

Vine by: Thomas Sanders

(Source: epic-vines)

onlinegf:

onlinegf:

send me your best pick up line

image

(Source: onlinegf)

hightimeslowtides:

emilygt:

dinosaurs-on-wheels:

where can I uninstall my period

i think if you download pregnancy it blocks it for a few months but then you get a really annoying loud pop up that doesn’t go away for 18 years

omg

image

rayguncourtesan:

trust-me-im-adoctor:

redventure:

juicyjacqulyn:

entropiaorganizada:

hookteeth:

hethatcures:

This legitimately upsets me.

… Y’see, now, y’see, I’m looking at this, thinking, squares fit together better than circles, so, say, if you wanted a box of donuts, a full box, you could probably fit more square donuts in than circle donuts if the circumference of the circle touched the each of the corners of the square donut.

So you might end up with more donuts.

But then I also think… Does the square or round donut have a greater donut volume? Is the number of donuts better than the entire donut mass as a whole?

Hrm.

HRM.

A round donut with radius R1 occupies the same space as a square donut with side 2R1. If the center circle of a round donut has a radius R2 and the hole of a square donut has a side 2R2, then the area of a round donut is πR12 - πr22. The area of a square donut would be then 4R12 - 4R22. This doesn’t say much, but in general and  throwing numbers, a full box of square donuts has more donut per donut than a full box of round donuts.

The interesting thing is knowing exactly how much more donut per donut we have. Assuming first a small center hole (
R2 = R1/4) and replacing in the proper expressions, we have a 27,6% more donut in the square one (Round: 15πR12/16 ≃ 2,94R12, square: 15R12/4 = 3,75R12). Now, assuming a large center hole (R2 = 3R1/4) we have a 27,7% more donut in the square one (Round: 7πR12/16 ≃ 1,37R12, square: 7R12/4 = 1,75R12). This tells us that, approximately, we’ll have a 27% bigger donut if it’s square than if it’s round.


tl;dr: Square donuts have a 27% more donut per donut in the same space as a round one.

god i love this site

can’t argue with science. Heretofore, I want my donuts square.

more donut per donut

(Source: nimstrz)